Chapter 5 GPS Element 3: Analysis and Correlation Homework: Molly McKinley
Thomas W. Jones, Mastering Genealogical Proof (Arlington, Virginia: National Genealogical Society, 2013). [Book available from the publisher at http://www.ngsgenealogy.org/cs/mastering_genealogical_proof , also available
in Kindle format through Amazon.com] Jones, Thomas W. (2013-12-04). Mastering Genealogical Proof (Kindle Locations 598-599). National Genealogical Society, Inc.. Kindle Edition.
Thomas W. Jones, Mastering Genealogical Proof (Arlington, Virginia: National Genealogical Society, 2013). [Book available from the publisher at http://www.ngsgenealogy.org/cs/mastering_genealogical_proof , also available
in Kindle format through Amazon.com] Jones, Thomas W. (2013-12-04). Mastering Genealogical Proof (Kindle Locations 598-599). National Genealogical Society, Inc.. Kindle Edition.
GPS Element 3: Analysis and Correlation answers:
To keep from infringing on Dr. Jones’ copyright I will
answer the questions using one of my own record citations.
This is the marriage license of my great uncle Thomas
Lafayette Hames:
("Florida Marriages, 1830-1993," index and images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:23CN-R1L
: accessed 3 June 2015), Thomas L Hames and Katharine L Feuchter, 16 May 1942;
citing Marion, Florida, United States, county courthouses, Florida; FHL
microfilm 1,872,211.)
Questions
|
Answers
|
Explanation
|
Is the source authored work, original record or derivative record?
|
Original (digital image)
|
Marriage certificate produced by the state of Florida
|
Who is the informant?
|
Thomas L Hames, Katharine Feuchter and Judge D.R. Smith
|
The judge stated his actions, the other two would have given their
own name, etc.
|
Is it primary, secondary of indeterminable?
|
Primary
|
It is an image of the original
document
|
Does it provide direct, indirect or negative evidence?
|
Direct
|
|
Why was this source created?
|
To certify the marriage of Thomas Hames and Katharine Feutcher took
place legally in the state of Florida
|
|
Was there a time lapse between the date of the event and the source’s
creation?
|
No
|
|
Was the record keeper careful?
|
Yes
|
|
Was the source open to challenge, verification or correction?
|
No
|
|
Was the source protected from bias, fraud or tampering?
|
Yes
|
|
Was the informant reliable as both observer and reporter, or did they
show potential for bias or other factors that would affect reliability?
|
Yes
|
|
After answering the questions above, how useful is this source to
provide evidence?
|
Yes
|
The information provided is a legal document, used to prove a
marriage in the state of Florida
|
[questions are based faithfully from the questions on location
1442/3958 of the Kindle version of the book, so that the answers would be
true to the book’s quest]
|
||

No comments:
Post a Comment